A foreword

Hello to all.
I have no intention to loose words on what is going on here and how to partecipate: a normally developed male should understand that this place is a food for his mind and soul. Saying this speaking of HQ wanking should scandalise nobody, right?
In this Blog you can say what you want, and I’ll moderate only when I feel like, but basically, no censorship at all. There are older members of my late Forum around and some will show up, and those will lead you, but have in mind, this is no poshy place for primadonas; just tits and thinking.
Should you have a comment on boobs or religion, on cunts or polititians, on fucking or free thinking, please, go ahead and post it.
And buzz of instead if you have anything to say on kiddy stuff or nazi shit you live in the spirit of double morality or hypocrisy.
Oh, and there will be a shop here for the hopeless. Even larger format pics there, the three here above on the right side of the screen you can find as a welcome starter gift, free to distribute, or just print and wank over them or whatever else your imagination tells you to do with them…but for more quality wanking you’ll have to serve yourself in the Anekee’s shop, opening soon.
Enough. Gentlemen, start your engines.
| Posted in Anekee's Posts only57 Responses to “A foreword”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.









(53 votes, average: 3.81 out of 5)




January 21st, 2009 at 4:11 am
It’s been a big day. Barack Obama is our new president. America is transforming itself again. I’m proud, for the first time in many years.
I hope everyone who reads this can share this hope with me…
And the pictures are great! Who is that very young girl in the garden? The one with the sweet, steady gaze?
January 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am
Obama has done nothing yet, and America will not transform through one person only. The biggest win of Obama was that he won, expect no bigger change than this one.
January 23rd, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Dear how long will you keep the audible media sound on this page? Its annoying
Secondly I agree with you TOTALLY about OBAMA and I voted for him…”Change” does not happen over night, I don’t expect much from him in his first term other than enacting new ways to govern that are actually shrouded in technology yet seem eerily similar to OLD Politics.
January 23rd, 2009 at 6:54 pm
OK… I appreciate you Anekee, but I must think that you’ve not a good sexual life in this very moment: you’re so pessimistic! Every revolution, every important change was lead by ONE Man! And if you mean that no one should wait for changes from “outside”… than you’re right! PS Don’t you think that’s unbelieveble that Hillary’s first call as Secretary of State was for Abu Mazen?
January 24th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Domite:
On Obama again: let’s also face the real constitutional power of the American President which far from what most people imagine.
You can lower the volume to zero…and never listen it again.
Blueworld:
Even screwing five times a night would not change my “pessimistic” attitude, which I experience mostly as rather realistic. On revolution: next one will be anarchic, not any more led by one person, those were times were ideaology was the motor. Those times are gone, revolution isn’t one person’s leadership any longer, as you can see one can’t gather together more than 30% of the living population anyway. Simbolically Obama’s victory is an important thing against racism mostly, showing the way to go for a global human race as an accepted reality, but from this point reached with him as a black President we have to count only on changes we can bring within ourselves.
In other words, he’s not there to fight and preserve your financial/material security and gadgets you filled your houses and garages with…these will go anyway as they got there.
Gauantanamo, Abu Mazen…I would go slow on calling a “change” the act closing them or acusing them, while most of americans haven’t even face them yet…and by far felt any personal responsability yet. Now, how far are we from facing Iraq or Afganistan as facts? Will Obama pull out one day and we’ll all leave as nothing happened?
January 24th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Okay, I agree with Blueworld. Anekee needs to get laid! Don’t worry, cher, there is someone out there for you!
But seriously, all pessimists believe they are realists.
Change is the only constant. Sometimes it happens over night, sometimes it takes decades. Something has definitely begun, in the U.S.A. in Europe, Asia. The only thing that seems never to change is the endless slaughter of jews and arabs. As my friend Joe once said, “Taking off his turban, saying “Is this man a jew?” If you prick them, do they not bleed? And it’s gone beyond killing for god. Now it’s just become a reflex. I say Hands Off!
We have to put our own house in order, before we can ask others to act with civility.
And we didn’t elect Obama to solve our problems for us, we elected him so that we could solve OUR OWN problems.
Perhaps there is some residual ill will towards the U.S. I can understand that, and I can move beyond that. But we are all in this world together, so please don’t put the brakes on!
January 24th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Human Intelligence seems to be constant, too. it’s the number of people that is increasing.
January 24th, 2009 at 9:29 pm
First of all let me say that …once or twice will always be much better than 5!! And as these are two different worlds… “There’s so many different worlds, so many different suns, and we have just one world, but we live in different ones”… and this is also the situation between jews and palestinians as many others. So is not important who and “where” we are: just respect each other …and do not try to rule and control the others. As H. Thoreau (I think…) said: If I’d know for sure that someone is coming to me with the will to benefit me, I’d run as far as possible. Another thinking is about the pessimism: it’s sounds like a dichotomy that a realistic person could take up anarchy. Nowadays is not! Anyway: if everyone would learn how having a full sexual satisfation, then probably it would fade the desire of war.
January 25th, 2009 at 3:35 am
Full sexual satisfaction. Can it ever be? Humans can be so perverse! For me it’s just Tits and Clits, but of course there is also Polymorphis Perversity! I’m calling on all Anekee fans to step up and proclaim your desires! If you’re on this blog, I’ve got a good idea what you like, but if anyone has any interesting fantasies, I think our moderator would like to hear them. I know I would!
January 25th, 2009 at 8:26 am
It’s “lose words”, not “loose”. It is right at the beginning of the foreword, so you might wanna change it, cos it lives wrong & ugly impression.
January 25th, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Yes, you are right. And saying this, I ask anybody who’s feeling like digging into my initial texts and improve them with correct grammar and sintaxis, etc…go ahead, post a copy/ paste text with corrections and I’ll change with it the original one. Of coursr this can start polemic between different views of whats correct, between Brits, Amis and preffessors of English from other sides of the globe, but let’s take a chance. I’m not a native english speaking gorl, my mother thongh is Dutch, and I studied italian for several years (I live in Italy).
January 25th, 2009 at 9:58 pm
Well, let’s say that choosing Obama before Joe the Plumper’s ideal president is one good step forward. And that Obama has seen the world; confronted multiple cultures and religions and so became wise to a certain degree.
But if that will be enough to lead the US and solve multiple problems on the global scale, only the future will tell us.
Personally I find Obama a good dude…
January 25th, 2009 at 11:04 pm
Being a religious fanatic is his biggest limit…I wish he’s just pretending to be such a devoted crisitan, to correspond better to the “acceptable” nigger image for the other half of the America. Cos’ if he isn’t, and he really sees life through the Bible than you and consequancely us are all in the same ol’shit.
January 26th, 2009 at 2:09 am
Great seeing you online, Anekee! Warmth from California!~
January 26th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Same ol’BS indeed
January 26th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Skeptics and Cynics! There is nothing inherently wrong with being Christian. There are some very good values in Christian teachings. I am not a practicing Christian. I think that religion is the cause and the root of many of the conflicts in the world, but I don’t dismiss christianity just because I disagree with priests and preachers.
We all live here at the same time. There is no future, but the one we make.
People who automatically dismiss someone who is really working for good, are the same kind of people who watch great achievements and say, “Oh yes, I could have done that, but it’s not quite right, is it?” In other words: They see others working and achieving and they shit on them for their efforts. They ulterior motives everywhere, and can’t accept that there are people really trying to change the way things are.
Sorry. I got off on a rant, there. I’m not a politician, and I’m anti-religious, but I do see a glimmer of hope in the man.
January 26th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
cool, but do not touchme Obama
)
January 26th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
I think the following happend:
Going through an election period isn’t exactly putting someone at rest. I mean maybe Obama spoke about religion or acted like a good christian because he was at a strain by the election pressure.
Let me elaborate this further; When I go to my grandfather who was in WWII he often tells stories about the people during the World War II period. One in particular striked me the most:
“People where in my time already not so much religious anymore. The didn’t talk about God or their believes, they rather denied it or ignored it. And they were certainly not wearing cross necklaces or praying in public. But one day a lot of German forces were closing in on the city I lived in. Immediate attack was eminent. All of a sudden the people started praying and grabbing their rosaries.”
I found this a very striking story. And find it very appliable to the Obama question. He found in his strain and uncertainty the comfort of God or the cult of christianity. Get what I mean? This is the way it goes with religious persons.
And to take the meaning of this story even further. When people get involved in wars, all of a sudden religion starts to get very important and common. People unite under the banner of a religion and make of it a holy war. I’m just thinking that other reasons (like money, etnicity, territory, etc.) ignites the flame and that religion is only some kind of fuel for their machine of war.
January 26th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
Religion is a gun. And he sworned on the Bible. Who’s interest is he going to represent?
January 26th, 2009 at 10:48 pm
He should ofcourse represent the interest of the people, but to what certain degree he will do this remains THE question.
January 27th, 2009 at 1:41 am
RE: spelling and grammatical errors, it’s “Buzz OFF” not “Buzz of”…
January 27th, 2009 at 3:26 am
Interesting program on television, tonight. As I download images of Anekee, I am listening, and watching a program about J. Robert Oppenhiemer. What wonderful stimulation for my mind and my body. Anekee and the Bomb!
Oppenhiemer had a tumultuous romantic life. Interested in French poetry, and Hindu Mysticism. His quote on the successful detonation of the first Atomic Bomb: “Lo! I am become Death! Destroyer of Worlds!”
He loved to ride in the desert, and yet he lived in a world of atomic particles.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Only Americans used the Atomic bomb so far.
January 29th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
Americans use everything, blind consumers!! Curse them…
January 29th, 2009 at 11:39 pm
Yep, buying stuff with money they don’t have.
February 1st, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Welcome Back Anekee!!!!!i’m happy to be here!
February 2nd, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Oh, Legolas…hmmm, internet is really making the world small. Welcome. BTW, invite somebody YOu liked to relate in “the old days”. Cheers!
February 2nd, 2009 at 11:43 pm
Wow so much thought, with such great scenery, but perhaps first and foremost all of this thought whould be about tolerance. People get upset, and think everyone must believe as they do, yet they would not allow someone to do the same to them. Even though I find Anekee’s proportions to be perfect for my desires, does not mean there are many people who prefer accents of different assets. Some of us see the “hope” that is offered in the election of Obama, is tolerance, and understanding.
Second, if any religion were to aspire to their teachings peace would prevail. Anyone claiming any violence in the name of religion is blaspheming. The 3 religions most talked about in the western hemisphere began with a diety unhappy about his peoples treatment of one another, and he punished them. The second religion began with a Diety that offered his life in exchange for our efforts to be kind to one another. And the last began with a prophet who believed people should be nice to one another, for their own good, and they will be rewarded, handsomely(hopefully with 72 Anekees) in the afterlife. So religion itself is not bad, but anyone claiming they can lead you in the ways of any one of these teachings should themselves be questioned.
Finally, I appreciate the opportunity to share, and so glad it can be in a lovely location.
February 3rd, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Nice words, but tolerance is often a trap. Rather easy is misunderstud as indefference…or a “non-action2. A person that does nothing regarding something that actually distirbs his/her mind because judgung him/her- self “tolerant” is often just…lazy, or indefferent, or…coward. Regarding the religion you nailed down the theory, yes, all of them are teaching peace and tolerance…but they were all abused in the past till today to the point of comiting the biggest crimes in a name of them. The reason lies in the insitiutions and goverments near these institutions using it to reinforce their power. Religion is meant to be personal thing but it’s always insitutional. it’s like army, declaring that guns are made for preventing war.
February 3rd, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Your dislike of America is obvious. That’s fine, you are entitled to you own opinions.
Regarding your last post, what, exactly do you do about the things that disturb you? You don’t like the situation in Gaza, but what have you done about it?
February 3rd, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Sredne, disliking America is not the same as disliking Americans, so don’t take it personal, but if your identity is to close to “the Eagle” then your god help you. Whad di I do? This blog for example? i talk you talk, we think we gather others we spread a thought…it’s all far more than nothing. And if this becomes big enough I’ll step ahead and backed up with a number (because the number “counts”)I will be listened. Sounds like a plan, right? What do you do instead? Well, i tell you, you being here is a kind of an action already. This blog is siletnly seen by around 1000 people a day, and it is it’s third week of life. So let’s go ahead with this pretending we actually are doing something, ok?
February 3rd, 2009 at 6:53 pm
Pardon my typos.
February 3rd, 2009 at 10:05 pm
Numbers counts?? 4 what? 4 a bank account! Or in an electoral running! Perhaps I haven’t understood (I’m just practising english, and doing that in this pleasant way) but …it’s seems to me that you just speak as a politician! (so you don’t believe in an “A” world!) …you’ll step ahead backed up with a number??! And where, if you mind??
Only consciousness really counts! And the goal is improving our own consciousness and “infect” others! That’s what you/we are doing… (in this simple, odd and original way) and only this can really Change history.
If we are so involved with this world “order” to need that car (50/150.000$) and that shoes (700/1500$), then our ego will be so enormous and this lack of humility will sadly make completely impossible to upgrade our consciousness… And who holds the power will keep on doing his own personal business… Think this out!
PS From this point foreward, even if I’m logged as Blueworld I’ll sign as… Sarastro
“…Laßt sie der Prüfung Früchte sehen. Doch sollten sie zu Grabe gehen, So lohnt der Tugend kühnen Lauf, Nehmt sie in euren Wohnsitz auf!”
February 3rd, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Ach!…an Opera fan! O Isis und Osiris…Sarastro’s aria: Let them see the fruits of the test; But, if they should go to the grave, then, the valient course of virtue rewarded, receive them in your abode.
February 4th, 2009 at 12:28 am
Okay, I took a shower, and a nap, so I’m calmer now.
No, I don’t identify so closely with the Eagle, and anyway citizenship is an accident of birth, and to say that Americans used the Atomic Bomb is not the same as saying America used the bomb. I am an America, but I am not America, you see?
Making blanket statements, generalizations, is tricky business.
As for specific action? I think America pushed back the Nazis in WW II, and saved the Amsterdam and Milan, among others, from fascism. For myself, I taught English language in Asia, after graduating from school.
From that I learned that travel to foreign countries is the best way for us to understand other cultures, other people.
I’m curious to know what other countries are represented here in Anekee’s Blog. It seems I’m the only representative of the U.S.A. and possibly the only native English speaker.
February 4th, 2009 at 12:44 am
This will be for a very short time so, Shredne. Blog is “observed”…by many. Give time to people. And, yes, I am going to do the same now..shower and nap.
February 5th, 2009 at 11:45 am
I remember the forum….ehhehe Anekee has a lot of fans!This new blog is lovely too!For Shredne i think that there are more english speaker here than you…i’m not one of them…but here, there are no differences you can express your opinion as other people!i know Anekee from a lot of years and she always don’t moderate people writings!you can express as many opinion as you like here!we only discuss about them…Usa in this last 8 years had a not condivisible politc and now the entire world have economical problems…this is only one of the aspects…war is an other aspect too…but all people here can make free dialogs!this is the important
February 21st, 2009 at 2:04 am
Will the forum ever be up again, Anekee?
February 25th, 2009 at 3:19 am
Being “in” or “out” appears to be an important issue in this Blog. There is so much talk about identities. This place is really weird and fun. Why do people that came to this place for obvious reasons now have arguments on politics? This is special and I would not exclude my own person from that question. Can somebody give an true answer to it? I like the self portrayal as a pessimist, calling him or her self a “realist”, which is the key ideological expression of our time, if I may say so. A different question for me would be, what do you think about the relation between religion and modernity? Because religion is referred here as if today living people would never been detached from tradition and would live in an pre- capitalist era. Also it is interesting to read that someone who is not in friendship with the nation of Jews in the same time is a friend of numbers – something Jews have been equated with in the 20th century. And perhaps anti-Americanism does not suit somebody who believes in (big) numbers too. I like pessimists but what do you think about realists? Today many members of the ‘68 generation call themselves “realists” – after they came into power and repeated what their parents did, whom they were fighting against.
February 25th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
How come clicking on amir’s name brings me to another site? Obviously spam???
February 25th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
I take a look around and I don’t like what I see. This blog is going slow, has not got many posts, stands in the way of ongoing communication or conversations. It’s just some bunch of physical and mental masturbators saying what they have to say and milking what they have to milk.
There is a smell of hostility even more on this blog than on the epic forum. (Yes, I am an Anekee’s Forum survivor). The cute Riserva girls don’t even post here, it is a testostoron bowl of fiesty males. It isn’t smooth because the posts are pending a couple of days before they get visible to others. What are you fearing Anekee?
It is just a mix of opinions not even crashing against eachther in a decent, oiled conversation. A guess a moderated blog with pending comments is a wrong concept for doing that kind of stuff…
Your idealistic view upon the www is beginning to float towards the sky, if every opinion or comment were something well written and thought over then I would see a good blog but this nonsense hitting numerous others on the internet is ridiculous. I’d say fight your quarrels in a chatbox or through skype or something, but not in a blog were every post is saved and listed. I can’t even imagine how Anekee even approves this nonsense comments completely unaware of the nature of a decent blog.
I like to call her A !! (Now you probably know who I am…)
Ciao a tutti
February 26th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Now we are talking! Finally someone took a step towards souvereign contemplation. Thank you Notrust! Is not the hostility in this Blog part of the question why we are here? And what steps would you like to take to have a more “fluid” kind of talk? Are not the conditions of talking an object to politics too?
March 7th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Hey, NoTrust. I was a keen visitor to Annekee’s forum too. I don’t recognize your nick though. I kept mine the same. Who were you at the forum?
March 9th, 2009 at 9:21 pm
I posted under my real name, that’s all I can say. I don’t trust this blog enough to reveal it… Okay?
March 12th, 2009 at 10:56 pm
I think I know, B.O.
March 24th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
I thought about the concept Anekee chose. A plus is that you can think about it a long time before you post, looking at ths blogs slowness.
November 9th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Exactly.
And the old Forum was a fertile ground for flame wars, the time delay of a blof converts a flame war into a more productive discussion.
Dear members, please, get an avatar…it’s easy, just send a desired pic to a anekeeblog@gmail.com. …it’s so much easier for everybody to follow.
November 12th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Well no, the forum was more than flame wars. Maybe it was you who focused on the wars. But you are host and cared about the flamed ones.
I didn’t experience that much of flaming or being flamed. Maybe that’s also because you were/are a good host.
November 15th, 2009 at 4:11 am
Well, as promised in your prologue, I’m still waiting for the shop, or some new pics of the week, etc.
November 17th, 2009 at 4:24 pm
If you are experiencing flame wars on a forum, or even a blog, it’s due to moderators/admin not taking the steps to prevent such things. Which is fine, as long as the admin of the site doesn’t mind that kind of thing. But, if it’s the entire reason you take down a site, then it’s just improper management. Sometimes it can be a little difficult, but once it’s realized that it will not be tolerated, it will dwindle off. However, in the meantime, an unmoderated blog or even a forum would be fine, as long as the postings end up being moderated, even if after posting. And, it can help keep conversation move a bit faster.
Of course, this is just my own experience as an admin/creator of a couple of forums. In the end, it’s entirely up to the person in charge. And, as long as people are still posting and still coming to look, obviously something is going alright.
November 17th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
My forum had no moderation adn it proved that freedom leeds to war.
November 18th, 2009 at 8:48 am
Which is kind of my point… You need some moderation, but posts should be (in my opinion) controlled after posting, not before. It makes for the flow of posting a bit easier.
That point aside, if the philosophy ‘freedom leads to war’ stands, then what would your stance on an Anarchy ‘government’ be?
November 18th, 2009 at 10:24 am
Exactly this. But let’s exchange “war” with “revolution” to make it seem noble.
November 18th, 2009 at 7:22 pm
And what after the ‘revolution’? I’ve thought a bit on your stance with anarchy, and unless I miss the understanding of the term ‘anarchy’, it would totally depend on each other’s abilities to work with each other. Which, we could easily have in today’s society but the end fact is, if a person is kind another person will take advantage of this kindness. This results in anger and eventually violence. This is why we have governmental systems. If people were able to live together without rules and laws, they would. They can’t.
November 18th, 2009 at 7:57 pm
An added note, I noticed a lot more writings on your main site. Why not add them here to open them for discussion?
November 28th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Want to see more Anekee? Want to share your thoughts with her and her many other fans? Visit Anekee’s FaceBook page!
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=170379572454&ref=ts
March 24th, 2010 at 3:55 pm
Anekee, you are once again correct about Obama, i am even starting to feel sorry for the poor guy, who i believed had convinced himself that he could accomplish some meaningful change. The fuss the powerful made about even the slightest meaningful reform over health was unbelievable. It is always ironic how American capitalist so fear and despise the state, when it was a huge injection of capital by the state during WWII which got the system out of the mess it had been in during the 1930’s. Anyway, i will have to disagree with you about the next revolution being more ‘anarchic’, i am afraid i am a bit of an old theorist, you may associate that with ‘Stalnist,’ I think with ever greater power and centralization of forces and capital a planned a co-ordinated overthrow of the system is required…. But anyway, we can agree that even if Obama was a saint, which he is not, he would not be able to change things, the US system represents that interests of the rich and powerful whoever its president be.
Anyway i need to stop wasting my time writing this stuff, but your ideas are interesting Anekee….